Friday, July 30, 2010

Infinity By Euro Sport (st950

About Us.

A new subject: the situation is serious but not serious ...

Today there is a new project in the world of student associations.

The Federation of Students aims to work with a structuralist approach, but free to politics.

The constituent phase we will discuss that today we open not only to school and politics, but also of the way, the tools by which we come out of this world, which today are too far apart, now we try to get them to approach without so as to break the thin thread that binds them, without having the objective of making as many cards as possible, but thinking about the ideas that we present ourselves.

We will be an individual with a strong political autonomy, but by no means isolationist, try sharing with all stakeholders that we have, starting from the other student associations, whereas, also in a battle of true unity of knowledge workers, essential to a strong and stable political relationship with the CGIL, which in recent years has proven to be the only true union that kept a straight bar on the opposition that in the workplace, not only schools, was made against a government and now that he saw as out of a crisis for which enormous numbers of workers ended up in layoffs, and he thought of defeat as almost all non- the rest of the world-with new investments-but continuing to cut.

This constituent phase will have to live at the national level but especially in the territories, which will organize in the coming months, not without a certain degree of autonomy that meets local needs and peculiarities in the choice of political partners to work with and relate to the territory .

In the first few months will need to start as a priority, a territorial structure of our subject, which will allow us to activate a national assembly that must be the place in which to focus the discussion on our policy priorities, but also on the forms, bodies, the tools we to be able to equip ourselves better to be an association that is both strong and structured, but also very heavy and measure student.

Many of us have other experiences like this: student associations and unions that were too self-referential bureaucratic order to field the same desire for freedom that participation is the best tool for high school students who want to commit, or attempt to create schools directly through participation in the youth organization, which meets the problem of having to ask students to choose 15 years not a party but a political party whose military.

Both instruments have the same great Limit: one involving only part of students, those partiticizzati or those who are so politicized structures will be very heavy. Today in schools there is a silent and indifferent majority of students can be involved if we do not claim to create participation, either directly through a project party, or association with the mammoth structure, which sometimes meant to attract students talking of organizational practices without stopping to reflect on an overall design background, without flying high.

Open this phase of the constitution because we feel the need for a new space that is processing and movement, in which students can put network about their experiences and ideas, but also on policy and planning assistance to other students.

In recent months we work on a new, strong person who can bring the contents of the debate about the school, is able to respond across the square and through the discussion, but above all able to talk through participating sites open and horizontal, and to speak to our generation with its language and without him down.

A subject that must be the instrument in the hands of a generation condemned by a backward and poor school system, which will open the doors of a university and also very poor and unfair to a world of work that has no protections for young people, in which job insecurity reigns supreme.

A generation that wants and needs to take its own space, who can do it if it is able to blow up the contradictions of a training system and welfare policies that preserve the privileges of a few barons or through the corporate real microsystems, to the detriment of law in many, many of those who are eligible for scholarships but do not have it, many of those who can not pay the tuition of mathematics if the school can not afford a course of recovery, many of those who remain outside the a limited number of faculty, many of those who feel the weight of the cost of textbooks, subscription to public transportation - or, worse, private companies - which they use to go to school, many of those who may now stand in silence because they think it is unnecessary or because they feel exploited. Many of those to whom we turn often, but we have to stop to address only ideally, starting to really give them the voice, so that our battle is not only the students informed and politicized, but is to a generation that wants to be wide.

Through a real political participation.

Small Breastfeeding With Husband

Living in the school newspaper

2 - to our seats!

( Representation, school construction, Orientation )


strong association can not be conceived as a think-tank structure and present abstract, we have to live primarily in schools, to retrieve a combination of size of institution that is not just a group that organizes the event, but an association that must be close to students in everyday life.

We work on the quality of our presence in institutions, with a job that is tangible and expendable, closer to the needs of students. We do this by starting from the representation. Just at a time when you want to destroy himself with the role of students in the school community, through the bill Aprea, we must show that we are capable to take advantage of our new space to be able to claim. The work on the representation must
from networking the many positive experiences that we are on, by creating places in which to share and think again, fielding a total work.
The goal must be present next year in all schools where we are present, representatives who stand as candidates with programs that are real platform created and shared by the whole association, enhance and encourage the use of student committees that decide the use of funds for activities complementary or integrative provided by Presidential Decree 567/96 places through processing and exchange of ideas on projects thanks to those funds can be made, bring in the Provincial Board, the National Council of Presidents shall, in the forum of associations of the Ministry of Education, the development programs and projects that will allow us to be in those spaces with a force policy and more people, especially on the right, use them only to plant a flag in the interests of politicheggiante risiko, in which the minority student associations, more or less organized, more or less present and recognized in the territory, they pretend to be counted.
representation must be the main way by which to reach our voice to the students, because they highlight the role of students in the community school necessarily entails knowing how to exploit the spaces that we are institutionally recognized. For this we need to pick up some valuable tools that have made the history of student unions, such as "guides" for high school students, useful in fighting the idea of \u200b\u200ba passive student community in schools through a real understanding of the rights and duties of students.

We do not want that in schools students are only behind the counter to take notes and follow the lessons, we will not be taxable, we want to participate in our spaces, the training process, which should target not only the teaching of knowledge and skills, but also to encourage the growth of critical consciousness and citizenship education in civics is not an hour a week, but through participation in the life of the school community.

Precisely through sharing we aim to trigger a mechanism that leads students to feel part of a community that they too need to protect and which they feel connected.

think about the topic of school, one of the sore points of our system, that comes to light only when serious accidents happen when a guy dies in the place where it should be safer, but that is a structural problem that students living on their skin in everyday life.

funds for construction are the responsibility of the province. There are situations where a responsible political class, albeit with a gradual reduction in the funds allocated by the national government - despite the recent tragic news events - perpetrated in recent years, are long-term investments, building new buildings, renovating schools owned by the state, but there is also a big part of the provinces where they squandered a huge amount of public money to support the payment of rent, the restructuring of schools in private hands - often chosen, however, very little transparency with a mechanism- not represent a forward-looking solution for this problem.

Here again, we must build a network of representatives that can gather and report problems and needs intervention institutional entity responsible, thinking of an institutionalized and active involvement of students in the chain, now inefficient investments by provinces on school facilities. Because the problem of students who do not respect the place in which they study, go by what this is decadent and inhospitable. Just as the positive relationship that there must be between students and faculty must be based on the concept of mutual respect, not subservience.

The teacher-student relationship can not, in the third millennium, a relationship that is based only on the principle of authority.

The ministry announced in a style reminiscent of the battle of the grain, which returned to the school of discipline, wants to wipe all the small steps forward on this issue the center-left had made, introducing the concepts of self-assessment of students of grids that measure the knowledge and skills, taking into account the interest of the student, participation of extra-curricular activities. Today we must take that road, holding up the shot, thinking about what is not normal that in our country there is no real system for the evaluation of professors, who argue that refresher courses are far from the concept of lifelong learning that should be introduced in Italy, not only for teachers.

school autonomy can truly be the driving force of change in public school, but for now how it is translated only aims to strengthen the power, in some ways illegitimate, school leaders.

Interpretation sick of school led to a system in which schools are encouraged to compete with each other trying to grab as many students as possible, even with real marketing campaigns that advertise the many addresses between to choose from, in brochures that are distributed in high schools.

We believe that the central theme of orientation knows, the end of each course. We think that there should be a non-competitive information, but lay on the secondary school to choose from, like the university to choose from, why it is important that this choice is made being helped, not deceived by the various Italian schools and universities, because if This method will continue to be in our system, two major problems: will the high number of students who feel like fish out of water within its curriculum, and will continue to increase demand, already high, the deserving students, with specialized technical skills.

in Italian schools has remained basically damaging a "hierarchy" is not formal, substantive, between the addresses of high school. E 'statistically proven that students who come from the medium with good grades, choose a high school to a large extent, while those who come up with a worse preparation, are directed toward the technical or professional, resulting in a school population in which the excellence is concentrated in humanistic and scientific, by automatically become the engineers and professional schools as second, but instead should be the schools where they meet the Knowledge and know-how, the schools from which children should go out today with skills for which demand, within companies, continues to grow.

That is right, even on this issue, the wrong way, it is confirmed by the fact that the Minister Gelmini in the reorganization of education resulting from the cuts she committed, in those schools has cut the hours and funding for the labs, which essentially subjects are to characterize those addresses.


we must tackle the challenge of starting from these points to start a discussion on the overall idea of \u200b\u200bour school, to bring in all the places where we want politics to stay: bed, tables, steps, because the ideas that we will produce will be characterizing the real force of this subject.

How Do You Say Happy 50th Anniversary In Spanish

Changing the school, from Rights and Education.

1 - Change the school

( Right to Education, Education, Multicultural )

Italy is a country which has always been little investment on the training of people, especially on a mass training. A country that continues to consider a sustainable education system that leaves behind a large part in the paths of individuals to whom it applies.

The effects of this shortsightedness are obvious and serious. The statistics, in fact, a decade in our country tell us that the school drop out rate is much higher than the European average. In Italy too many children are forced or choose not to graduate, because of economic and cultural leave, even before of 16 years, your course of study.

The statement can not be considered an investment that families, according to their means, do it for the future of their children, must, as written in the constitution, a right and duty of all.

Globalization, despite its great contradictions, we know, is not a zero sum game: it is also an opportunity for all. For all individuals, like all nation-states, to measure their talents and resources for questioning and make progress.
We can not think, however, that a challenge like this can be captured and "play" to the best of a community brought to the people to decide on its future by looking to its past, looking to their economic and cultural conditions of departure, rather than to their own abilities and ambitions.

Only by putting people in a position to choose their own path in life and to live freely in our country will turn into a modern community, to the occasion. A community - or a combination of multiple communities, school autonomy - freedom of individuals to address their future.

In Italy the right to study the laws are the sole responsibility of the Regions. This legislation creates a very uneven in different areas, to which is left even the freedom to decide on cultural approaches employed, from region to region, in the absence of a national framework within which to place their action.

They range from the regions, based on a model that tries to take care of all of the conditions, many allocate funds for scholarships, transportation, textbooks, etc. .. For others that do conceive the right to study as a "reimbursement" of expenses incurred on those families who freely choose or can afford to spend and invest on the education of children. Often, this model is reflected in bonuses handed out to the families of students of private schools. Clearly, these

two models, if taken as an extreme, there is a majority of regions that allocate very little gray and / or interested much less in terms of social and political right to study, first ignoring the centrality of economic policies within the territory .

long the center-left, youth organizations, student associations, calling for a national framework law on the right to an education that sets the minimum levels guaranteed in all regions, we also think that on this issue is necessary to consider, because region to region, there can be a different cultural setting in place all under the same conditions to study, because it would mean have different settings on the sense of the school.

our school, we know, is still based on the model of the now prehistoric Gentile reform, with the building when Venice was still inhabited in 1923, whose thinking was to have an education system that may play a role of mass literacy, and 14 years separate the guys who would choose a high school: the ruling class, and those who would choose a technical or starting professional work force.

Net assessments about what was wrong, back in '23, to have a school system in which an individual's place in society was almost irretrievably determined by the choice of school, it is clear that this system is impractical, especially today, after the Italian company, the labor market, the level of banal mass literacy have changed. Today we have a society where the illiteracy rate, at least one, is very low, where the number of members of the university has grown exponentially, in which the technical work has become specialized work. Today the school should start school autonomy, enhance any training in the same way, having united, not separated, as in the logic of the right knowledge and know-how.

In the third millennium, the "Knowledge", understood as a set of knowledge and skills necessary to do the job, increased by much. This fact should make us reflect on how important it is to invest more on training system, which must prepare students to deal with the university, or let them enter the world of work with the specialized technical skills.

The relationship between school and work, which was to represent a breakthrough in our strong education system is managed very badly. Today, students in internships in most work for companies that participate in their training rather than exploiting them shamelessly for tasks that have very little training. On this we can act with an action that is primarily a complaint, to protect those still within the education system, was sent to prepare the coffee - also for free-a holding that it should contribute to its formation. The theme of a national status of students in internships, is long overdue.


The school should not be understood as a selection tool, but as a space where students can accumulate on all disciplines, with the help of a class teacher who does not treat them as users of a service, but help them find and create their own areas of interest. To implement this ambitious goal, that rhetoric can be expressed with ease, you need a totally new concept of teaching in high schools, starting from the realization full of school, trying to bring it to life not only with extra-curricular projects, utilities on, but enforcing it with a mechanism that is quite flexible for students who come out from the rigid system to try to meet as much as possible to the capabilities and interests of each student.

There is much to change here, but it must clarify our ideas, we must reflect on the way to school tomorrow, as seen from the left, making students feel really part of a community, creating a school that does not include all the political model of 6, but with the flexibility needed to meet the difficulties as to the quality, of each student.

The school that we are culturally distant from the vision of the right, which sees the school as a place where you can measure, in which the boys immigrants, even those born in Italy, but with a different skin color, should be made in separate classes.

true We believe in inclusion, not based on doing good penny, but based in accordance with the principle of a public school for all, giving the opportunity for foreign students to integrate fully in the training system, enabling him to have the same tools as those leaving a better condition financially and culturally, the only way to defeat the stupid and the prevailing fear of eternal stranger, the different.


300k Pixels Dual Mode Camera Digital Camera

Where we come from, where we go.

Autumn of 2008 marked the recent history of student movements. They did the hundreds of thousands of students took to the streets to protest against cuts of Berlusconi, Tremonti Gelmini and our education system (8 billion euro in three years), introduced as one of the first measures the new government.

Who had watched closely the policies of the last center-right government on the issue of knowledge, the motivation was clear: to aim to reduce costs, also cutting the number of teachers, even at the cost of dramatically limiting the investment on the quality of teaching even threatening to leave the education system of our country back a few dozen years behind the rest of Europe, also agreed to cause significant social problems by reducing the number of hours, going to hit, in fact, schools in their more profound role of social elevator of the community.

The right assumes that schools should be a last choice, a lifesaver for those who have no alternative. For those families who are unable to enroll their children to private schools not being able to take advantage of government incentives in the form of bonuses.

unhealthy background to this idea, adding the short-sighted cynicism of a government that faced with the need to raise cash, drawn from sectors such as schools and universities, endangering the operation and free access.

The students and Italian students have responded to this attack together in a fitting and effective slogan that has occupied the streets, squares and the front pages of newspapers for many months: "We will not pay for the crisis."

A strong, spontaneous movement has upset not only for an autumn the public and politicians, including the youth, but also the world of unions and student associations throughout the galaxy of political youth organizations that have been heard - some pleasantly other less- swept away by a protest that led, as in the past, but which were themselves largely party.

The first problem happens right in the heart of the protest, after a hot morning of mobilization. A brawl breaks out between Piazza Navona Casa Pound, far-right movement, and young people from the community centers. Here the "tidal wave" shows his weakness first and the problem goes beyond the fighting, the violence perpetrated by neo-fascist groups in the sight of a police almost compliant.
seems clear that the movement is strong, innovative forms of participation, but immature field of politics, unable to organize the proposal to make it consistent, refusing more to be aware of this limit. Wisdom of the assemblies it was also a source of pride: "we reject any political characterization, not just party." As if hundreds of thousands of people who claim to fight for something they were not themselves political.

The political defeat, not only by the 'wave' as such, but a project that could be mobilized for the first time, and whole, a generation that did not even ever chosen for itself a slogan that represented the occurs after a few months. One senses from the moment when the public begins to digest and then takes up the pithy phrase with which Maria Stella Gelmini had dismissed the first protests, "all students in the square are the conservatives who do not want to accept the reforms. "

The movement would not or was not able to organize themselves to respond on the ground of politics. So upset that the millions of innovators around the country were taken to the streets to defend their rights of students and to return to training, to study the centrality necessary, paradoxically, have been relegated to the role of defenders of a system to know one of the oldest poor and the West.

E 'where all the student associations could have but failed to take the space to build on their policy development. Remained caged on one side of the controversial nature motion, second by not having sensed that the priority this time is not understand how many and which colored flags - or color - the squares, but lies in the ability - and humility - to make the content available a big move, but fragile. Maintaining the political maturity and lucidity to understand how mundane the natural flow of a long wave, but still seasonal, some people have tried in vain to ride surfing, ideas, yes those, like Peter, would remain on the beach policy. And among these, the best they could even change something.

We claim that our presence in movement, not deny. Today, awareness of the need to go further, we show an ability to learn to know what were his wealth and its limits, its like from our mistakes.

to stop looking in the mirror and ask ourselves who we are and who we are, if we are divided or united, if we are left more or less, more or less union, more or less movement, more or less representative, more or less political. To stop doing all this while most of the students had stopped to consider ourselves a real reference point, either inside or outside schools and almost without our realizing it.

To try to revive an idea of alternative school and contemporary, with the idea that student participation can not be reduced to the analysis, challenge and - when it succeeds - the proposed improvement of the law of this or that year for this or that minister but that should be returned to the right to a long-term thinking, today's students the opportunity to dream and to organize to build the school of tomorrow.


To return to talk about school and politics together.